Research Article
Hanna Jankowiak 1 , Aleksandra Cebulska 1, Gabriella Novotni-Dankó 2, Péter Balogh 3, Anna Zmudzińska 1
1Department of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2Department of Animal Husbandry, Institute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Böszörményi street 138, Hungary
3Department of Statistics and Methodology, Institute of Statistics and Methodology, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Böszörményi street 138, Hungary
Abstract. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of age on the fattening performance qualities and carcasses slaughter value. The assessment covered 99 crossbred pigs (Danish Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc). The animals were subdivided into two groups with different slaughter age (159 and 169 days). The assessment covered fattening and post-slaughter characteristics. It has been proven that, at slaughter, younger crossbred pigs showed a higher growth rate than older pigs (P<0.01). In addition, the former were fattened for a shorter period and consumed less feed across the entire fattening period as well as per 1 kg of gain. Carcasses of pigs older at slaughter were characterised by greater warm carcass weight and height of the loin muscle relative to group I carcasses (P<0.01). Slaughter value of fatteners from both groups studied was very high, as each of the carcasses under assessment was classified under the most valuable categories S, E, and U.
Keywords: pigs, age of slaughter, fattening and slaughter assessment
Received: 20 Feb 2023
Accepted: 12 Apr 2023
Published online: 13 Jul 2023
Accesses: 344
Jankowiak, H., Cebulska, A., Novotni-Dankó, G., Balogh, P., Zmudzińska, A., (2023). Growth rate and carcass quality of hybrid fatteners depending on the age of slaughter. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootechnica, 22(1), 25–32. DOI: 10.21005/asp.2023.22.1.03.